Legal and Professional Issues



Click here to order this paper @Superbwriters.com. The Ultimate Custom Paper Writing Service

1. Set out the assignment in report format;
2. Include an introduction and conclusion to their work;
3. Interpret and exam ALL the issues that occurred for the patient Mr Symes throughout his admission, with particular emphasis to be given to the legal and ethical issue
4. Use headings to break-up main points of discussion (put each ‘issue’ identified in the case study as a heading);
5. Support their argument with references to contemporary, scholarly literature obtained through the library databases (not websites);
6. Include reference to Hong Kong-specific nursing codes, policies and documents in their report. 

  1. Assessment task 3
Assessment 3 Case Study (2500 words)
Task DescriptionEthical : The surgeon didn’t review his/her patient after the procedure.

Ethical: Nurse did not call for help in busy situation.

Ethical: The nurse did not deal with those distressed patients.

Legal: Improper and inadequate documentation.

Legal: No proper documentation on medication chart.

Ethical: No evidence of analgesia administrated.

Legal: No proper documentation on patient’s notes.

Ethical: No given full information on shift handover.

Legal: Patient may have early treatment if problem can be early identify. It might charged with negligence.

The aim of this assignment is to identify and examine the role of the Registered Nurse (RN Prior) in the case study below. Students are to identify all the key events that occurred throughout the patient’s admission. Particular emphasis is to be placed on the legal and ethical nursing practice roles and responsibilities.Mr Rory Symes is a 64 year-old man who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a large metropolitan hospital on the morning of 21 May 2017. Mr Symes was transferred to the Extended Day Only Unit (EDOU) at 1430 hours following the procedure. Mr Symes was to stay in the EDOU overnight with discharge planned for the following morning (22 May 2017).

A Medical Officer (MO) assessed Mr Symes at 1630 hours on 21 May due the patient reporting abdominal pain and distension. Mr Symes’ distended abdomen and pain levels were documented in the patient’s medical record by the MO and a phone call was made to report this information to the surgeon who performed the procedure. Analgesia was prescribed (10mg morphine subcutaneously) at 1715 hours to be given PRN 6 hourly in response to the patient’s reports of pain.

Ms Carol Prior was the RN working on the 12-bed EDOU with another RN on 21 May. RN Prior had been registered as a nurse for five years. As per hospital policy, RN Prior and one other RN were the only two staff members rostered to the unit on night-shift that commenced at 2245 hours.

The EDOU was at capacity on the night of 21 May. Two of the other male patients admitted to the unit were distressed; one was continuously vomiting post-appendectomy and the other was experiencing urinary retention following a Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP).

There was also a female patient admitted to the unit who was very upset at being placed in a room with male patients due to her religious beliefs. This patient, who had very limited English language skills, was continually wailing and expressing anger over the fact that hospital management had not resolved this issue as promised to the patient and her husband on the afternoon shift.

At 0210 hours on 22 May 2017, RN Prior documented the following in Mr Symes health record:

‘Temp 38.9, P 126, Resp Rate 16 and BP 110/72 (approx)’

These were the only observations documented during the night- shift. There was no evidence of analgesia administration documented on Mr Symes’ medication chart by the time day-shift staff commenced work.

The day-shift RN for 22 May did report that RN Prior had verbally stated that she had been “extremely busy” all shift and had not finished her “notes” by the time handover occurred.

At 0630 hours on 22 May 2017, Mr Symes’ temperature was recorded by the day-shift RN as being 39 degrees, heart rate 140bpm and blood pressure 80/46mmHg. He was experiencing acute abdominal rebound tenderness and reported that his pain levels had rapidly increased throughout the early morning. Mr Symes was ultimately returned to theatre where a perforated bowel was identified and successfully repaired.

Students are to:

l   Set out the assignment in report format;

l   Include an introduction and conclusion to their work;

l   Interpret and exam ALL the issues that occurred for the patient Mr Symes throughout his admission, with particular emphasis to be given to the legal and ethical issues;

l   Use headings to break-up main points of discussion (put each ‘issue’ identified in the case study as a heading);

l   Support their argument with references to contemporary, scholarly literature obtained through the library databases (not websites);

l   Include reference to Hong Kong-specific nursing codes, policies and documents in their report.

l

Please review the marking guide below to see how marks are allocated for this assessment.

Assessment Due Date 20th November 2017 23:55 hours
Weighting 50%
Assessment Criteria Your assignment will be evaluated on the following assessment criteria:Content – 80%

Referencing & formatting – 20%

Referencing Style Author – Date (Harvard) A summary of the Harvard system can be accessed in the online guide on the Library website at: http://uow.libguides.com/refcite/uowharvard

Legal and Professional Issue

 



Click here to order this paper @Superbwriters.com. The Ultimate Custom Paper Writing Service

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>